Sustainability:

Living As If The Future Mattered

 

 

Humans, and we Americans in particular, are rapidly destroying the Earth.  People have three main reactions when confronted with this distressing fact:

 

            1)  Denial.  Ignorance is bliss.  Out of sight, out of mind.  This is an age-old -- and perfectly understandable -- human survival strategy that has outlived its usefulness.

 

            2)  Bring it on!  59% of Americans believe that the events foretold in the Book of Revelation will literally come true.  Thus, any problems we are encountering and will encounter -- war, drought, pestilence, etc. -- confirm the correctness of scriptural prophecy, and are to be welcomed.

 

            3)  Maybe we should do something about it.  This can be called the “rational approach.”  Americans are, after all, supposedly a can-do people.  We supposedly can do anything we set our minds to, including saving the Earth.  But only a minority of Americans are rational.   

 

Despite polls indicating that most Americans support the environment, these numbers are deceptive.  Saying they support the environment allows people to feel good about themselves without having to actually do anything.  Their behavior indicates that they don’t respect the environment nearly as much as they say they do.  When push comes to shove, Americans will almost always treat themselves to that new SUV, fancy new home, global vacation, or other high-impact consumer choice rather than living in a less destructive manner.

 

Being an American is about getting ahead in life.  Nothing -- not even the planet -- is more important.  Denial about the true cost of the American way of life is always the convenient and culturally-sanctioned choice. 

 

Only a minority of Americans are attempting to live in a manner that doesn’t destroy the planet.  Some people use the term “sustainable” when referring to this kind of  lifestyle.  “Sustain,” as with a musical note, means to go on and on.  When a musical note (or a civilization) doesn’t sustain, it dies out.  Dozens of civilizations have already died out over the millennia, and ours is next in line.

 

For the minority of Americans who believe that maybe we should actually do something about the ongoing environmental crisis, there are three main options to choose from.  The first two are personal lifestyle choices, and the third is a culture-wide shift:

 

1)  The “conscious urban consumer” option.  These people tend to recycle, bicycle or use mass transit, drive fuel-efficient cars, utilize alternative healing modalities, shop at smaller stores such as co-ops, or shop at farmer’s markets.  They donate to environmental and progressive groups.  They tend not to shop at mega-stores such as Wal-Mart.

There are two main disadvantages to this option:  a) Too few people practice it to make much difference, and b) they are still dependent on -- and therefore still enabling -- the existing exploitative and destructive economic infrastructure.

 

2)  The “I want out” option.  Popular during the 60s and 70s, this option typically involves buying a piece of land, building a passive solar home, growing a garden, and utilizing off-the-grid electricity (solar, wind, or hydro).  This option will become more popular once again as baby boomers reach retirement age, assuming they have any retirement funds left.

Disadvantages to this option include:  a) Too few people practice it to make much difference;  b) expense and effort buying land, building a house, drilling a well, purchasing an expensive off-the-grid electrical system, etc.;  c) long commuting distance which means that country people tend to do a lot of driving;  d) except in rare instances, most people practicing this option are still dependent on the existing economic system.

 

Both of these options offer a measure of personal integrity and self-satisfaction.  At least such people are doing something, and hopefully their lifestyles will become more sustainable as time goes on.  But the fact remains that only a few people are going to live this way -- not enough to make the difference that is required. 

 

This brings us to the third option:

 

            3)  The only option that can make a significant difference would be a culture-wide change of behavior, starting with the rot at the top.  How does this sound:

 

Americans are hungry for a positive vision.  We want to leave a habitable planet for our children and grandchildren.  We want renewable energy and fuel-efficient vehicles now, so that we can finally be free from the curse of oil.  We want to have fair and honest elections for a change.  We want a country with a level playing field for rich and poor alike.  We want a country with excellent medical care for all.  A country with a strong educational system.  A country where all points of view are listened to and respected.  A country where we aren’t manipulated to hate and fear each other.  A country that heals the planet rather than destroys it.  A country that practices peace instead of war. 

 

It’s a compelling vision, but at the present time we lack the political power to make it happen.  The unholy trinity of the Neocon Republican Party, Corporate Elite, and Religious Right have a lock on our corrupt political system and the government’s propaganda arm, the corporate media.  The masses are hypnotized into complacent acceptance, and we have limited opportunities to reach them.  To save the Earth from destruction means taking over the government, and this effectively means revolution -- a peaceful revolution to be sure, but a revolution nonetheless.  I honestly don’t know if we have the clout to do this.  But we have no choice but to try. 

 

A well-known sustainability advocate recently said that it’s a real balancing act getting his message across.  He’s constantly walking the razor’s edge.  If he comes across too alarmist, he takes people out of their comfort zone and they tune out.  If he comes across too moderate, people stay in their comfort zone and don’t do anything.  Getting people to actually change their behavior without freaking into paralysis takes considerable finesse, and he finds it challenging to present his message in just the right way to successfully inspire people to change.

 

So it won’t be easy.  Earth remains in the balance, and what we do during the next few years will permanently tip the scales one way or the other.  While we’re busy tipping the scales, let’s remember to have as much fun as possible.  What could be more joyful than saving the Earth?

 

(Gordon Solberg keeps bees and grubs in the dirt near Radium Springs, NM.  His email address is earth@zianet.com.)