Key events and history for PeaceAware and PeaceVigil - compiled by Gordon Solberg


Key dates:

Aug. 24, 2002 -- Bush speaks at Pan Am.  110 protestors, spearheaded by regional Quakers, and the Border Womens' Group.

Sept.  20 -- Demonstration organized by Kevin Bixby.  About 100 people.

Sept. 25 -- first peace vigil at Fed Bldg.  About 60 people.

Laura Solberg, Vickie Aldrich and Gordon Solberg organized the first peace vigil; we handed out flyers at Kevin Bixby's Sept. 20 demonstration, and sent out emails to the Quaker list, SWEC list, Green list, and everybody we knew.  Our first vigil had a total attendance of about 60... we were very pleased.



This is the first peace newsletter; lots of history here:

LAS CRUCES PEACE UPDATE
Monday, Sept. 23, 2002



THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK

It’s inevitable, I suppose -- that the most powerful empire the world has ever seen is now in the grip of mass psychosis.  Worldwide, far more people fear George W. Bush than Saddam Hussein.  It’s been awesome, watching this unfold -- the stolen election,  the relentless hard-right, take-no-prisoners attack on America by the “Uniter, not a Divider” Bush regime,  culminating with the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks which handed Bush & Co. unlimited power.   Since then, of course, the Bush regime has been on a roll that appears unstoppable -- between the bought-and-paid-for Congress, and the corporate press, people like ourselves have been given short shrift, or more accurately, no shrift at all.  Our country has been hijacked, and I for one am frustrated to the extent that I will take my picket sign and literally stand for peace out in the hot New Mexico sun, because nobody in power is listening to me.  How about you?



THE SEPT. 20 DEMONSTRATION

We will never get fair reporting from the corporate-owned, pro-Bush Sun-News, so I intend to write up an accurate description of every peace gathering I attend.  Here’s my first report:

Friday’s peace demonstration was very encouraging.  More people showed up than I had expected -- college students, baby boomers, retirees -- an excellent mix.  I wish I had counted the participants.  My best estimate is:  significantly more than 100, maybe as many as 150.  Did anybody make an actual count?

Also very encouraging was the response of the passing motorists -- WAY MORE people honked, flashed the peace sign, or gave us the thumbs up than yelled epithets while giving  us the finger.  And the protest signs were just marvelous -- what a creative bunch of rabble rousers!  Many of us came away from the demonstration with a feeling of relief, a feeling of “I am not alone.”   We also realize that our work has barely begun.  Reclaiming the soul of this country will take an incredible amount of remedial work.


PICKING THE SUN-NEWS COVERAGE TO PIECES

The Sun-News article about the demonstration was pretty typical.  It’s important to remember that the Sun-News, like virtually every other newspaper in this country, is owned by a corporation.  The Sun-News is officially pro-Bush.  (They once said about Bush in an editorial, “He leads us, and he leads us well.”  All I can say to that is, who is this “us” they are referring to?)

I talked to the Sun-News reporter, Steve Ramirez, a couple of times during the demonstration, and found him to be a personable guy.  But I also heard from a fellow demonstrator that Ramirez is known for getting his facts wrong.  Sure enough, the very first sentence in his article was wrong.  He said, “About 50 Las Cruces residents… staged a peace march…”  Of course, the press always underestimates the number of demonstrators --  they were famous for doing this during the Vietnam protests, as well.

Other errors included getting Susan Frary’s occupation wrong and my email address wrong, but I will turn now to the main fault I found with the article:

What I saw at the demonstration was that most  passing motorists didn’t respond to us, but of those that did, most were positive.  Let us now take a look at Ramirez’s account:  He gave the positive responses exactly one sentence, and he qualified his sentence to weaken it:  “As they marched some motorists honked their horns and waved at the demonstrators, apparently in support.”  (Wow, I sure appreciated all that apparent support we received, didn’t you?)  Then Ramirez gave two extended examples of motorists “shouting vulgarities” and “extend[ing] [the] middle finger.”   The point I am making is that most demonstrators, I’m sure, were pleasantly surprised by the amount of positive response, whoops, I mean apparent positive response we received, but a person reading the Sun-News article would conclude that most Las Crucens are pro-war.  This is slanted journalism at its most insidious, but is all we can expect from the corporate Sun-News.  I hope that my words can help set the record straight to some extent.


PEACE VIGIL

We hope to get as many people as possible at our weekly Wednesday afternoon peace vigils.  The Bush war machine isn’t going away, and neither are we.  We will be holding our peace vigil every week, rain or shine, for… who knows how long?  Months?  Years?  As long as it takes for peace and justice to prevail on this planet?



EMPOWERMENT THROUGH EMAIL LISTS

In this age of email lists, it is no longer necessary to “form a group” before organizing a peace event.  We already know what to do, so let’s do it!  For example, the Friday demonstration was started by one person -- Kevin Bixby -- who came up with a plan and sent it out to the Southwest Environmental Center email list.  People on his list forwarded it to their lists, and so on.  Thanks for getting the ball rolling, Kevin!

There will always be a need for  formal, organized groups, but street actions can easily be organized with email.  All you’ve got to do is come up with a plan, and email it out.  There are many people in this town anxious to speak out against Bush’s war machine.  Thanks to email lists, thousands of people are potentially but a few mouse clicks away.

If our Wednesday afternoon peace vigil doesn’t fit into your schedule, all you’ve got to do is put out an email asking if anybody wants to do a peace event whenever and wherever you choose.  (NMSU would be a fabulous location.)  Send your announcement to us and we will forward it to our list, who will forward it to their lists, etc.  Since ultimately everybody will be on everybody else’s lists, the beauty of this system is that you can send your email pretty much anywhere at random, and it will get forwarded to everybody.  There is no longer a need for leaders, just instigators.  Our cyber tendrils are everywhere.


LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS

Laura spent a lot of time on the phone contacting various authorities and this is what she found out:  She talked to the Federal Marshal, who handles security for the Federal Building, and learned that we are free to have peace events on the public sidewalks in front of the Federal Building, but we aren’t allowed on the grass, or inside.  Also, we aren’t allowed to obstruct pedestrian access into the building.  Fair enough.  Laura also talked to the Las Cruces Deputy Chief of Police, who said that no permit is required to hold a peace event.  We are not allowed to obstruct vehicular traffic in the streets, or pedestrian traffic on the sidewalks.  Fair enough.  It looks as if we are free to do any kind of peaceful activity we want, on any public sidewalk in Las Cruces, as long as we don’t make a nuisance of ourselves.


WEBSITE?

If anybody out there wants to do a Las Cruces Peace website, that would be very helpful to everybody.  It could be used to post upcoming events, etc.


THANKS!

Thanks to everybody who participated in the Sept. 20 demonstration, and to everybody who will be participating in the future.  I don’t know what influence our actions will have, but we’re definitely doing the right thing.  If there was ever a time to stand up and be counted, it’s right now.

Gordon Solberg
Las Cruces Peace Vigil Committee
earth@zianet.com





LAS CRUCES PEACE NEWSLETTER #2
Sept. 27, 2002


A SUCCESSFUL FIRST VIGIL

We held our first vigil on Sept. 25, and were very encouraged by the turnout.  One participant counted 40 people.  It’s safe to say that at least 50-60 people attended at one time or another during the two hours we were there.

It was so good to connect with our fellow peaceniks.  What a relief!   I heard the same comment over and over:  “Thank you for organizing this; I thought I was the only one.”  A lot of people in this country feel railroaded by Bush and the corporate media, and have a feeling of hopelessness.  After standing out there on the sidewalk for two hours talking to my fellow vigil-antes and seeing how many passing motorists gave us the peace sign or thumbs up, I feel that a groundswell for peace is happening here in Las Cruces.  (And if it’s happening in Las Cruces, then it’s happening everywhere.)   Al Gore’s speech on Monday and Jeff Bingaman’s speech on Thursday have been very encouraging.  It’s hard to say where these small day-to-day shifts of momentum will lead, but one thing is certain:  If enough of us speak out, loudly and persistently, we can rescue America from the madness of war.

All we can do is give this our absolute best shot.  This is an exciting time.  With breathtaking speed, a grassroots peace movement is spontaneously arising all across our nation.  We are, each of us, making history. 

We hold our Peace Vigil every Wednesday from 4-6 pm, in front of the Federal Building, corner of Church and Griggs, in downtown Las Cruces.  We hope to see you there!  If you can’t stay for the entire two hours, no worries --  just come when you can; we will be glad to see you. 






LAS CRUCES PEACE NEWSLETTER #4
Oct. 4, 2002


OUTSTANDING TURNOUT AT WEDNESDAY’S PEACE VIGIL

Considerably more people turned out for this vigil than for the first one.  We filled the better part of two blocks along Church St., and made an impressive visual statement with all our signs and flags.  We were very gratified to see all the high school and college students there, along with the boomers and seniors.  Our camaraderie was fabulous. 

I counted the crowd on three occasions; my high count was 61.  (The previous week’s high count was 40.)   Since a lot of people came and went during the two hours, it’s impossible to make an accurate estimate of the total number of people who attended -- I would guess 80 or 90.

We had several “Honk for Peace” signs, and they did their job very well.  It seemed like hundreds of cars honked during the two hours we were there.  Often several cars would honk at once, or cars would give one long continuous honk for the entire 2 blocks, with drivers and passengers giving peace signs out the windows.  Once again, positive response far outweighed the negative response. 

Americans who believe in peace are finding out that we aren’t alone.   Standing up to the Empire takes courage.  But if we don’t do it, who will?   By standing out there on Church St. with our flags and signs, we are helping to build consensus for peace.   We are showing the world that we care -- about freedom, democracy, justice, the Earth itself.    Thanks for coming! 



From newsletter #6:
SUNDAY’S PEACE REFLECTION
A GREAT SUCCESS

One hundred people gathered in Pioneer Women’s Park last night (Oct. 6) to celebrate peace with singing, drumming, and candles.  Considering that the peace movement in Las Cruces is barely three weeks old, this is a great achievement.  The open mike was very popular, featuring a wide variety of speakers and musicians.  Many new connections were made, and old connections were strengthened.  We appreciate all the energy that went into making this event happen, and we anticipate a lot more Las Cruces peace events in the future.



LAS CRUCES PEACE NEWSLETTER #8
Oct. 10, 2002


PEACE VIGIL #3

We had our third peace vigil yesterday at the Federal Building.  The usual suspects showed up, plus some new faces.  (It’s always good to see the young folks, such as radicalraver.)  My high count was 50; total attendance was probably 60 or 70.  In my role as peace vigil committee member, I say:  Way to go, keep it up!  In my role as concerned citizen I say:   Why don’t we have 500 people attending every week?  Can’t people see that history is in the balance here?

Pardon my frustration.  I’m sure you understand.  At any rate, the response from the passing motorists was, as usual, overwhelmingly pro-peace.  The print media were, as usual, not there, even though they had been invited.  The KVIA cameraman stuck his camera literally an inch from my nose and asked me to deliver, and quickly.  I knew I had a ten-second sound bite, so I said, “I’m concerned about Bush and his right-wing colleagues’ power grab, and that really bothers me.”  What did you say?  Did any of this get broadcast?




DISAPPOINTED IN THE SUN-NEWS

A couple of people, and especially my wife Laura, have encouraged me to apply to be guest columnist at the Sun-News.  So I emailed the editor some samples of my writing, and then, realizing I had a unique opportunity to speak directly to the editor himself, I finished with a final paragraph:

“While I have your personal attention, I want to let you know that I appreciate the Sun-News fairness policy, as far as it goes.  I appreciate the variety of opinions in your Sound Off section, and the fact that you evidently print most letters to the editor, even the ones that are critical of you personally.  However, I have been disappointed by the lack of Sun-News coverage of recent peace events in Las Cruces.  Over the past three weeks, hundreds of Las Crucens have stood in front of the Federal Building every Wednesday afternoon, in opposition to war with Iraq.  Yesterday KVIA interviewed some of us, but the print media were conspicuously absent, even though they had been invited to yesterday's event.  The results of our informal "honk if you're for peace" survey indicate that there is a very strong undercurrent of pro-peace sentiment in Las Cruces.  America is being railroaded into war, and the Sun News's failure to report the pro-peace sentiment in Las Cruces goes against every standard of decency and fair play our country supposedly stands for.”

As you can tell, I don’t really care about being guest columnist.  And you know what?  The best zinger is the simple, honest truth, delivered in a no-nonsense manner.  I just love zinging them with the truth. 





LAS CRUCES PEACE NEWSLETTER #9
Oct. 14, 2002


WE HAVE JUST BEGUN

Several people have asked us,  “Now that Bush has won the war vote, do you plan to continue with the vigil?”  Our answer is, ABSOLUTELY!  We have just begun to organize and speak out for peace.

Consider this timeline:

        Sept. 11, 2002  -- Many Las Crucens are disturbed by the knee-jerk, pro-war, “my country right or wrong”  tone of the 9/11 anniversary commemorations, but feel helpless and alone
Sept. 20 -- Demonstration in front of City Hall
Sept. 25 -- First downtown peace vigil
Oct. 2 -- Second  downtown peace vigil
Oct. 6 -- Peace Reflection in the park
Oct. 7 -- NMSU peace vigil
Oct. 9 -- Third downtown peace vigil

In only 9 days, we started a series of peace events that show no sign of slacking off.  More people are finding out about us every day.  Judging from the response from passing motorists at our peace vigils, there is a strong undercurrent for peace here in Las Cruces.  We can only get stronger as time goes on.

********

Well, that ought to give you something to work with.  Let me know if you have any questions.  Feel free to quote from any of my writings.  Good luck with your article!

Gordon

p.s.  What the heck, I'll just paste the historical article below.  I can't stop pasting.

SOME LOCAL PEACE HISTORY
(written for the Las Cruces Peace Newsletter, but not uploaded because that issue was already too long)

One advantage of a newsletter written for peaceniks by peaceniks is we get to create our own mythology, without having to filter it through an “acceptable” worldview.  With that in mind, I thought I’d jot a few words about how the Las Cruces Peace Vigil got started.

Like a lot of Americans, I became very disillusioned by the way Election 2000 was handled, or should I say, mishandled.  When the Bush Administration hit the ground running, literally from the first day they took power, I knew that something was terribly wrong, and my disillusionment grew with every passing day.  What a sick, helpless feeling that was. 

We now fast forward to Sept. 14, 2002.  (Which is only two weeks and two days ago, though it feels like much longer.)  The frustration had become unbearable.  Bush’s war plans seemed unstoppable.  Wasn’t anybody going to DO anything?

(As it turned out, a couple weeks beforehand, our friend Vickie Aldrich had told Laura and me about how she did a weekly Peace Vigil with some Quakers in Denver during the Vietman War.  Thus the vigil seed was planted, and, thriving in the rich mulch of frustration, quickly sprouted and bore fruit.)

It was on Sept. 14 that I talked to Tim Reed, Vickie’s husband, and told him that Laura and I felt a strong urge to do a peace vigil.  He said that sounded good to him, and he would bring up the subject at the next day’s Quaker Meeting.  That afternoon (Sept. 14), Vickie and I emailed back and forth and set up a meeting for Wednesday, Sept. 18.

On Sept. 16, Kevin Bixby emailed out his plan to hold a peace demonstration on Sept. 20.  We jumped in enthusiastically and told everyone we knew. 

Laura, Vickie and I held our Sept. 18 meeting as planned (nobody else came), sitting around Vickie’s kitchen table.  We decided to call ourselves “The Las Cruces Peace Vigil Committee” rather than “The Three of Us Sitting Around Vickie’s Kitchen Table Committee,” though this would have been just as accurate.

The Sept. 20 demonstration went off as planned (actually better than we had hoped).  On Sept. 23 I sent out the first issue of this newsletter, and on Sept. 25 we held our first Peace Vigil.  The next Vigil will be Oct. 2, and the Oct. 6 Peace Reflection will be the most powerful peace event ever held in Las Cruces, and this includes the Vietman War.

What’s important here is the pattern we see of people just jumping in and doing things, without asking, and without being told.  When something comes up in our face to do something, it seems the obvious thing to just go ahead and do it.  Aren’t grassroots dynamics wonderful to behold?

Gordon Solberg
Sept. 30, 2002